Description: The ETJ feature class is the Extraterratorial Jurisdiction of the City of Fort Worth. The ETJ represents unincorporated area extending generally five miles from Fort Worth's City Limit.
Copyright Text: Copyright 2001 City of Fort Worth.This data was created solely as a graphic representation for internal use by the City of Fort Worth. The City of Fort Worth assumes no responsibility for its content or accuracy unless expressly stated otherwise in writing. Reproduction of this data without the prior written permission of the City of Fort Worth is strictly prohibited, and is a violation of Federal Copyright law.
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: baseline Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: In the wake of a nationally publicized police incident and resulting protests, the Fort Worth City Council decided in June 2017 to appoint a task force of community leaders who would advise the Council about important and timely issues relating to racial and cultural equity. The task force focused on a wide array of disparities affecting the quality of life in Fort Worth, pertaining directly or indirectly to six general topics: criminal justice, economic development, education, health, housing, and education. Task Force recommendations can be found here.Super majority minority area polygons (equal to/greater than 75 percent). These census block group based boundaries were used in the analysis for the Task Force on Race and Culture. Block groups are vintage 2012-2016 American Community Survey.Fields of emphasis:GEOID10 Total_Popu (Total Population)Minority_P (Minoirty Population)PERCENTMIN (Percent Minority)Contact and Ownership: Natalie Watkins, Natalie.Watkins@fortworthtexas.gov, Sr Planner, Planning and DevelopmentEdit Schedule: Edited every 12-24 months, depending on changes on the ground. Starting 3/2019
Copyright Text: City of Fort Worth, Task Force on Race and Culture, https://onefortworth.org/
Description: The Home Owners' Loan Corporation was established in 1933 by the U.S Congress to refinance mortgages in default and prevent foreclosures. In 1935 they created residential security maps for 239 cities to indicate the level of security for real-estate investments. The maps were graded such as the newest areas, which were considered desirable for lending received a "Type A" grade. These areas were primarily wealthy suburbs on the outskirts of town. Still Desirable neighborhoods were given a "Type B" grade and older neighborhoods were given a "Type C" grade and considered Declining. Lastly "Type D" neighborhoods were regarded as most risky for mortgage lending.
Copyright Text: Robert K. Nelson, LaDale Winling, Richard Marciano, Nathan Connolly, et al., “Mapping Inequality,” American Panorama, ed. Robert K. Nelson and Edward L. Ayers, accessed September 16, 2020, https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redlining/
Description: The economic development incentive policy provides inventives for companies and businesses that will locate within the designated investment zones. Data Ownership: Isaac Robles, Economic Development Specialist, isaac.robles@fortworthtexas.gov, 1150 South Freeway, Suite 106, Quinn ComplexUpdate Frequency: Every two years or when the Economic Development Incentive Policy is updated.Update Method: Directly edited by Department userUpdated by: Isaac RoblesContact's Department Name: Economic DevelopmentContact's Position/Title: Economic Development SpecialistContact information: isaac.robles@fortworthtexas.govNext Update: 2021
Copyright Text: CDBG, HUD, AmericanFactFinder, City of Fort Worth
Description: Adopted Neighborhood Empowerment Zone Areas (NEZ) and Adopted Neighborhood Empowerment Zone Strategic Plan Areas. NEZ Areas are created for the development and redevelopment of NEZ Areas to promote the creation or rehabilitation of affordable housing; economic development or to improve the quality of social services, education or public safety for the residents of the NEZ Areas. While the NEZ Strategic Plan Areas are not adopted NEZ boundaries, the design standards will be honored. The NEZ boundaries were adopted by Council in January 2019 and will be updated every five years.
Copyright Text: Neighborhood Services & IT Solutions
Copyright Text: Planning and Development and Neighborhood Services Departments
Point of Contact: JonEric Eubanks
JonEric.Eubanks@fortworthtexas.gov
Neighborhood Services Department
Description: These are the areas of particular interest to the Economic Development Department for strategic revitalization as detailed in the Department's Revitalization Plan last updated in the summer of 2020.
Description: Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) - TODs are dense urban development areas located within 1/4 to 1/2 mile of commuter rail stations, modern streetcar stops, and similar fixed-route transit stations. Successful TODs contain a mix of uses, including higher density residential, and are carefully designed to be pedestrian-friendly and specifically oriented to the transit station or stop. TODs accommodate growth more efficiently that low-density subdivisions, while supporting increased use of transit and its associated traffic congestion and air quality benefits.
Copyright Text: Point of Contact:
Isaac Robles
Economic Development
Economic Development Specialist
isaac.robles@fortworthtexas.gov
1150 South Freeway Suite 106
Quinn Complex
Description: This data set represents the extent, approximate location and type of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the United States and its Territories. These data delineate the areal extent of wetlands and surface waters as defined by Cowardin et al. (1979). The National Wetlands Inventory - Version 2, Surface Waters and Wetlands Inventory was derived by retaining the wetland and deepwater polygons that compose the NWI digital wetlands spatial data layer and reintroducing any linear wetland or surface water features that were orphaned from the original NWI hard copy maps by converting them to narrow polygonal features. Additionally, the data are supplemented with hydrography data, buffered to become polygonal features, as a secondary source for any single-line stream features not mapped by the NWI and to complete segmented connections. Wetland mapping conducted in WA, OR, CA, NV and ID after 2012 and most other projects mapped after 2015 were mapped to include all surface water features and are not derived data. The linear hydrography dataset used to derive Version 2 was the U.S. Geological Survey's National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). Specific information on the NHD version used to derive Version 2 and where Version 2 was mapped can be found in the 'comments' field of the Wetlands_Project_Metadata feature class. Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and near shore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. By policy, the Service also excludes certain types of "farmed wetlands" as may be defined by the Food Security Act or that do not coincide with the Cowardin et al. definition. Contact the Service's Regional Wetland Coordinator for additional information on what types of farmed wetlands are included on wetland maps. This dataset should be used in conjunction with the Wetlands_Project_Metadata layer, which contains project specific wetlands mapping procedures and information on dates, scales and emulsion of imagery used to map the wetlands within specific project boundaries.
Description: This is the primary Active Transportation Plan bike network file for cartography consisting of centerline bike facilities throughout the city.Attribute ColumnDescriptionold_idold id used for conflation of featuresprojectidosm_idstreetstreet name from OSMstart_streetstart street nameend_streetend street namecity_limitsBinary. Is this project within city limits?atp_network_levelBike network tier: spine, rib, neighborhood connectionmtpBinary flag: Is this segment part of the MTP?futureBinary flag: Is this an unbuilt future street?cityIs the project within City Limits or Extra Territorial Jurisdictions?idprimary keyfclassflags projects along arterialsbike_facbicycle facility including status and whether it is part of the veloweb
Name: Active Transportation Plan Trail Prioritization
Display Field: project_description
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolyline
Description: Attribute ColumnDescriptionproject_idproject id numberatp_network_levelBikenetwork heirarchy: spine, rib, neighborhood connector.project_descriptiontext description of projectserves_mmaDoes it serve an MMA? 5 points for MMA, 10 for Super MMApoverty_pctWeighted percent of households in poverty within 500 feet of project.poverty_scaledPoverty percent stretched from 0 - 10.disability_pctWeighted percent of population with a disability within 500 ftdisability_scaledDisability percent stretched from 0 - 10connects_existingCount of connections to existing trails/bikeways.connects_existing_scaledConnection count stretched from 0 - 10interactive_map_priorityCount of bike-focused interavtive map comments intersecting the project.interactive_map_priority_scaledInteractive map scores stretched from 0 - 10equity_scoreCombined equity score including MMA, poverty, and disabilityveloweb_spine_scoreconnectivity_scoreExisting connections score (field included for symetry)demand_scoreDemand score (field included for symetry)stakeholder_scoreInteractive map score (field included for symetry)prioritization_scoreTotal prioritization scoreprioritization_score_scaledPrioritization score stretched from 0 - 10prioritization_rankPrioritization rankmma_typeType of MMA intersecting project: None, MMA, Super MMAschool_qtr_miTrue/False - is the project within 1/4 mile of a schoolpark_qtr_miTrue/False - is the project within 1/4 of a park?higher_ed_half_miTrue/False is the project within 1/2 mile of a college or university.npa_priorityTrue / False - Is the project within 100 ft of and NPA priority area.transit_corridor_qtr_miTrue /False - is the project within 1/4 mile of a major transit corridor?d2_rankPriority rank within District 2d3_rankPriority rank within District 3d4_rankPriority rank within District 4d5_rankPriority rank within District 5d6_rankPriority rank within District 6d7_rankPriority rank within District 7d8_rankPriority rank within District 8d9_rankPriority rank within District 9
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN><SPAN>These properties are conserved, at least in part, through the Open Space Conservation Program. Properties acquired in partnership with the Park and Recreation Department (park funding in addition to open space conservation program funding was used) will show an acreage in the "Park Acres" column based on the amount of Park funding used. See the specific M&Cs for more information regarding each specific property.</SPAN></SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Copyright Text: CFW Transportation & Public Works Department
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: baseline Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: The National Park Service (NPS) maintains the National Register of Historic Places, the nation's official list of properties significant in American history, architecture and archeology. More than 3,200 properties and sites in Texas have been added to this list, providing a comprehensive and growing index of Texas' cultural resources.
Description: The National Park Service (NPS) maintains the National Register of Historic Places, the nation's official list of properties significant in American history, architecture and archeology. More than 3,200 properties and sites in Texas have been added to this list, providing a comprehensive and growing index of Texas' cultural resources.
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>The FIRM is the basis for floodplain management, mitigation, and insurance activities for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Insurance applications include enforcement of the mandatory purchase requirement of the Flood Disaster Protection Act, which "... requires the purchase of flood insurance by property owners who are being assisted by Federal programs or by Federally supervised, regulated or insured agencies or institutions in the acquisition or improvement of land facilities located or to be located in identified areas having special flood hazards, " Section 2 (b) (4) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. In addition to the identification of Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs), the risk zones shown on the FIRMs are the basis for the establishment of premium rates for flood coverage offered through the NFIP. The FIRM Database presents the flood risk information depicted on the FIRM in a digital format suitable for use in electronic mapping applications. The FIRM Database serves to archive the information collected during the Flood Risk Project</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>The FIRM is the basis for floodplain management, mitigation, and insurance activities for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Insurance applications include enforcement of the mandatory purchase requirement of the Flood Disaster Protection Act, which "... requires the purchase of flood insurance by property owners who are being assisted by Federal programs or by Federally supervised, regulated or insured agencies or institutions in the acquisition or improvement of land facilities located or to be located in identified areas having special flood hazards, " Section 2 (b) (4) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. In addition to the identification of Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs), the risk zones shown on the FIRMs are the basis for the establishment of premium rates for flood coverage offered through the NFIP. The FIRM Database presents the flood risk information depicted on the FIRM in a digital format suitable for use in electronic mapping applications. The FIRM Database serves to archive the information collected during the Flood Risk Project</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Name: Lake Worth Greenprint Water Quality Priorities
Display Field: Priority
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: Priority Water Quality Zones as shown on Map 2 in the Greenprint Report. Priority Water Quality Zones for the Lake Worth Watershed as determined via the Lake Worth Greenprint process. The model for identifying these Priority Water Quality Zones included features that help protect water sources and help reduce pollution in stormwater runoff. The following criteria were identified by the Greenprint Technical Advisory Team for creating the Priority Water Quality Zones map, with relative importance as shown below: Riparian Vegetation 20%, Canopy Cover 15%, Floodplains and Buffers 15%, Wetlands 13%, Steep Slopes 11%, Steep Stream Banks 11%, Erodible Soils 11%, Native Vegetation 4%, Soils with Slow Infiltration 3%. Priority lands were identified as having the greatest potential for water quality protection. In the Greenprint mapping results, stream corridors stood out as critical features. See Trust for Public Land report for more information.
Description: The FIRM is the basis for floodplain management, mitigation, and insurance activities for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Insurance applications include enforcement of the mandatory purchase requirement of the Flood Disaster Protection Act, which "... requires the purchase of flood insurance by property owners who are being assisted by Federal programs or by Federally supervised, regulated or insured agencies or institutions in the acquisition or improvement of land facilities located or to be located in identified areas having special flood hazards, " Section 2 (b) (4) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. In addition to the identification of Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs), the risk zones shown on the FIRMs are the basis for the establishment of premium rates for flood coverage offered through the NFIP. The FIRM Database presents the flood risk information depicted on the FIRM in a digital format suitable for use in electronic mapping applications. The FIRM Database serves to archive the information collected during the Flood Risk Project
Description: The newly developed national connectivity dataset depicts a network of least cost path (LCP) connections between neighboring cores. Esri generated this comprehensive network of LCPs using the Cost Connectivity tool which was introduced in ArcGIS 10.4 and ArcGISPro in 1.3. Least cost paths reflect the route of least resistance between neighboring habitat core edges. The PathCost field represents the non-directional cumulative cost of this route. Cost is not accrued for movement within habitat cores, thus the portion of each path that falls within a core’s boundary should be considered schematic only. These paths can be used to create a network dataset for use in additional analysis. If a network dataset is created, it should be cost-based, rather than length-based due to the schematic and costless nature of traveling within a core. The PathCost, LowCoreValue, and HighCoreValue fields were used to generate a network graph. This graph was then used to compute Betweenness Centrality attribution for the HabitatCores feature class. While least cost paths are useful for illuminating the discrete path of least resistance from one location to another, they should not be interpreted as least cost corridors. Least cost corridors expand least cost paths to encompass functionally larger areas that may facilitate species movement.
Description: Descriptive keywords - :Keywords: Endangered, Parks and Wildlife, Rare Species, Texas, Threatened, TXNDDAbstract: These source features are independent and not attached to any element occurrence.Purpose: TXNDD Source Feature points as of August 22, 2019. Public Data Only.
Description: Descriptive keywords - :Keywords: Endangered, Parks and Wildlife, Rare Species, Texas, Threatened, TXNDDAbstract: These source features are independent and not attached to any element occurrence.Purpose: TXNDD Source Feature points as of August 22, 2019. Public Data Only.